History of Hindutva
In the vibrant tapestry of Indian identity, few terms evoke as much passion, debate, and division as Hindutva. Often conflated with Hinduism, this ideology has shaped contemporary Indian politics, cultural discourse, and social dynamics. But what exactly is Hindutva? Is it a revival of ancient Sanatan Dharma, a nationalist movement, or a tool for political manipulation? As India navigates its complex history of colonialism, independence, and globalization, understanding Hindutva requires peeling back layers of myth, history, and ideology.
This article delves into the origins of the term “Hindu,” its distinction from Sanatan Dharma, the evolution of religious practices, and Hindutva’s role as a political force. Drawing from historical texts, scholarly analyses, and contemporary critiques, we’ll explore whether Hindutva represents a genuine cultural assertion or a strategic construct that sometimes veers into deception and majoritarianism. Optimized for those searching what is Hindutva, Hindutva ideology explained, and Sanatan Dharma vs Hindutva, this 5,200-word examination aims to provide a logical, truthful lens on a topic that influences elections, identities, and India’s global image.
The Genesis of “Hindu”: A Borrowed Label from Outsiders
To grasp Hindutva, we must first confront the term “Hindu” itself – a word not born in the Vedas or ancient Sanskrit scriptures but imported by foreign invaders and traders. Contrary to popular belief, “Hindu” does not originate from indigenous religious texts; it’s a geographic and ethnic descriptor that evolved into a religious one over centuries.
The root lies in the Sanskrit word Sindhu, referring to the Indus River, the lifeblood of ancient civilizations in the northwest of the subcontinent. As Persian speakers from the Achaemenid Empire expanded eastward around the 6th century BCE, they pronounced “Sindhu” as “Hindu” due to phonetic shifts in Old Persian, where the ‘s’ sound softened to ‘h’. This “Hindu” simply denoted the land and people beyond the river – a neutral geographical marker, much like “Greek” for Hellenes or “Arab” for Bedouins. Madrascourier.com | Wikipedia.org
Greeks, arriving via Alexander’s campaigns in 326 BCE, adapted it further as Indoi, which morphed into “India” in Latin and European languages. Arabs, during the Umayyad conquests of Sindh in the 8th century CE, used al-Hind in texts like the Quran and travelogues, again as a territorial reference rather than a faith-based one. Medieval Persian chroniclers, such as Al-Biruni in his 11th-century Kitab al-Hind, described “Hindus” as the inhabitants of Hindustan, noting their customs but not framing it strictly as a religion. Quora.com
This external imposition is crucial: ancient Indians identified as Arya (noble ones) or followers of Sanatan Dharma (eternal order), not “Hindus.” The term gained religious connotations only during the Delhi Sultanate and Mughal eras, when Muslim rulers used it to distinguish native non-Muslims from converts and foreigners. British colonial administrators in the 19th century solidified it further, categorizing “Hinduism” as a monolithic faith in censuses and laws like the 1850 Caste Disabilities Act, lumping diverse traditions – from Shaivism to animism – under one umbrella. Stephen-knapp.com
Critics argue this “adoption from masters” – Persians, Greeks, Arabs, and British – turned a fluid cultural identity into a rigid religious box, ripe for manipulation. As one X user poignantly notes, “The word ‘Hindu’ is not Sanskrit, not in Vedic literature, and was developed by outsiders.” (Post by @stephenknapp, echoing broader scholarly consensus). This historical baggage sets the stage for Hindutva: if “Hindu” is a foreign graft, can an ideology built on it truly represent indigenous Sanatan essence? Stephen-knapp.com
In essence, “Hindu” began as a community label for Indus Valley dwellers, adopted passively from invaders. It never “represented a religion” in its inception but a diverse ethno-cultural group. This nuance challenges romanticized narratives of unbroken Hindu continuity, highlighting how external forces shaped self-perception – a theme Hindutva both resists and exploits.
Sanatan Dharma: The Eternal Way vs. the Construct of Hinduism
At Hindutva’s core lies a tension between Sanatan Dharma – the timeless, inclusive philosophy of ancient India – and “Hinduism,” often seen as a colonial invention. Proponents of Hindutva invoke Sanatan to claim cultural primacy, yet critics contend this masks a selective, politicized reading that deceives the masses.
Sanatan Dharma, meaning “eternal dharma” or righteous order, encompasses the Vedas, Upanishads, and broader Indic wisdom. It emphasizes dharma (cosmic duty), karma (action-consequence), and moksha (liberation), transcending rituals into a universal ethic of harmony with nature and self. As Swami Vivekananda described it, Sanatan is “not a religion but a science of life,” accommodating atheism, monism, and polytheism without dogma. Quora.com | Veda.wikidot.com
“Hinduism,” by contrast, emerged as a British scholarly construct in the 19th century, blending disparate traditions into a “religion” akin to Christianity or Islam for administrative ease. Orientalists like Max Müller coined terms like “Hindu pantheon,” ignoring Sanatan’s non-theistic strands. This reification fostered misconceptions: Hinduism as idol-worshipping polytheism, caste-riddled, and superstitious – stereotypes Hindutva leaders decry while weaponizing.
The user’s query highlights a key grievance: elites, “learned from Arabs, Greeks, and British,” repackage Sanatan as “Hindu religion” to “deceive the rest of Sanatan community for their own benefit.” This resonates with thinkers like Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, who viewed “Hinduism” as a tool of Brahmanical dominance, diluting Sanatan’s egalitarian roots. On X, users echo this: “Sanatana Dharma is changeless Atma Dharma… Hinduism is more of a broader term which has more focus on geo-cultural.” (Post by @hinduismstack). Hinduism.stackexchange.com
Yet, the distinction isn’t absolute. Many scholars, including Wendy Doniger, argue Sanatan and Hinduism are synonymous in practice, with “Sanatan” a 19th-century revival term to counter missionary critiques. Hindutva bridges this by defining “Hindu-ness” culturally, not just religiously – anyone tied to Bharat’s soil and ancestors qualifies, per Savarkar. This inclusivity appeals to subaltern castes, countering Congress-era secularism that sidelined Hindu identity. Hindudharmaforums.com
Misconceptions abound: Sanatan isn’t “divided” by castes (varna as fluid occupation, not birth); it’s tolerant yet firm against adharma. Hindutva’s error, per critics, is equating Sanatan’s pluralism with Hindu supremacy, alienating minorities while claiming Vedic purity. As X post @KalingaGajapati states: “Hindutva… is an artificial construct… scapegoats institutions of Hindu faith.” Worldhindunews.com |
Logically, if Sanatan is eternal and borderless, Hindutva’s nation-state focus feels contrived – a British-influenced nationalism masquerading as revival.
From Formless Brahman to Idol Reverence: The Vedic-Puranic Shift
A cornerstone of the user’s critique is the alleged “made-up stories” in Puranas to “enslave” Sanatan followers, contrasting Vedic monotheism. This narrative – Vedas preaching one imageless God, later texts introducing idols for control – merits unpacking, as it underpins accusations of elite deception in Hindutva.
The Rigveda (c. 1500-1200 BCE) indeed proclaims a singular supreme reality: Ekam sat vipra bahudha vadanti (“Truth is one, sages call it by many names”). Yajurveda 32:3 states, “Na tasya pratima asti” – “There is no image of Him.” Brahman, the formless absolute, pervades all; rituals were yajnas (fire sacrifices), not murti puja (idol worship). This aligns with Advaita Vedanta’s non-dualism: God as nirguna (attributeless), beyond anthropomorphism. Reddit.com
Idol worship emerged post-Vedic, during the Epic-Puranic phase (c. 400 BCE-400 CE), influenced by bhakti movements and folk traditions. The Mahabharata and Ramayana humanize deities like Rama and Krishna, while Puranas (18 major texts, c. 300-1500 CE) elaborate mythologies, temple rituals, and iconography. Agamas (sectarian scriptures) detail murti consecration, viewing idols as pratika (symbols) channeling divine energy – not the literal God, but aids for meditation, per Adi Shankara. Dlshq.org | Hinduism.stackexchange.com
Was this “enslavement”? Puranas democratized spirituality, making abstract Vedanta accessible to masses via stories, festivals, and temples. Bhakti saints like Kabir and Tukaram used vernacular tales to challenge priestly monopolies, fostering devotion over ritualism. Critics like the user see it as elite fabrication: “These same group made up stories mostly from Puranas to make slave the rest.” Indeed, some Puranic interpolations reinforced hierarchies (e.g., caste myths), but this reflects socio-political evolution, not conspiracy. Reddit.com |
Hindutva selectively embraces this: RSS promotes Ram Temple as cultural symbol, yet downplays Vedic formlessness to rally around icons like cow or Ganga. X discussions highlight: “Idol worship did not exist in the Vedic period… During the Brahmana period, a new form.” (Post by @quorauser). Logically, if Vedas reject images, Hindutva’s idol-centric campaigns (e.g., Ayodhya) stray from Sanatan roots, potentially “deceiving” followers into material devotion for votes.
Truthfully, the shift wasn’t enslavement but adaptation – from elite Vedic scholarship to inclusive bhakti. Hindutva’s use amplifies tensions, turning symbols into political weapons.
Hindutva: Beyond a Party – An Ideology Forged in Nationalism
Hindutva isn’t a mere political party or organization; it’s a worldview coined by Vinayak Damodar Savarkar in his 1923 pamphlet Essentials of Hindutva. Savarkar, an atheist revolutionary, defined it as “Hindu-ness” – a cultural nationalism where loyalty to Bharat Mata (Mother India) supersedes religious dogma. A Hindu, per Savarkar, is one whose pitribhumi (fatherland) and punyabhumi (holy land) coincide in India, excluding those whose sacred sites lie abroad (e.g., Mecca for Muslims). Britannica.com | Isdglobal.org
Born amid colonial humiliation and Muslim League separatism, Hindutva responded to perceived threats: Christian conversions, Islamic pan-Islamism, and Congress’s appeasement politics. The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), founded in 1925 by K.B. Hedgewar, institutionalized it as a paramilitary cultural outfit, emphasizing shakhas (branches) for character-building and Hindu unity. Its political arm, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), rose in the 1980s via Ram Janmabhoomi, blending ideology with electoral strategy. Theguardian.com
The user’s view – Hindutva as “a group ideology with knowledge due to learned from Arabs, Greek, and British” – holds partial truth. Savarkar drew from European nationalism (Mazzini, Garibaldi) and even praised efficiency in Islam’s unity, adapting them to Hindu context. Among “most intelligent people in India,” it appeals to urban elites, but grassroots adoption stems from subaltern grievances: Mandal-era caste politics alienated OBCs, whom BJP courted via Hindutva’s anti-upper-caste rhetoric.
Yet, it’s no monolith. Early Hindutva was secular-cultural; Golwalkar added spiritual fervor, linking it to Sanatan. Today, under Modi, it’s economic too – “Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas” (development for all) tempers hardline rhetoric. Carnegieendowment.org
For Hindutva history and origins, note its evolution from anti-colonial resistance to governing philosophy, influencing 1.4 billion lives.
The Deception Charge: Elites, Votes, and Sanatan Manipulation
Does Hindutva “deceive the rest of Sanatan community” by using “Hindu religion as a defender” while seeking votes from non-believers? This accusation, central to the query, warrants scrutiny.
Proponents argue Hindutva empowers Sanatan by reclaiming temples (e.g., Kashi Vishwanath corridor) from “secular” neglect, countering historical desecrations. (X post by @ARanganathan72: “Hindutva is the essence of Hinduism”). It unites castes under a shared threat narrative – “Hindu khatre mein hai” (Hinduism in danger) – mobilizing Dalits and tribals via schemes like PMAY.
Critics, including the user, see elite duplicity: RSS-BJP leaders, often urban-savvy, invoke Vedas selectively but promote Puranic spectacles for mass appeal. As X user @satoverma notes: “There can’t be any Hindu identity without its religious side,” yet Hindutva’s cultural focus dilutes Sanatan’s philosophical depth. During independence, figures like Madan Mohan Malaviya supported British alliances for Hindu causes, mirroring the query’s “Nauram Godse supported British” (likely typo for Nathuram Godse, Gandhi’s assassin, whose RSS ties are debated). X.com
Evidence of “deception”: BJP’s 2019 manifesto emphasized development over religion, yet campaigns featured cow vigilantism and anti-conversion laws, polarizing voters. X critiques abound: “Hindutva have the same ideology as Zionism” (@ArchonAvalon, post 39), or “RSS offshoots… exporting Hindutva extremism” (@realstory101, post 63). Eastasiaforum.org | X.com |
Logically, if leaders “did not believe in Sanatan” (e.g., Savarkar’s atheism), using it for votes borders on cynicism. Substantiated by leaks like Godse’s trial documents, where RSS ideology influenced but wasn’t direct cause. Truthfully, it’s a double-edged sword: empowerment for some, exploitation for others.
Religious Politics in Elections: Hindutva’s Electoral Machinery
In Indian elections, Hindutva “plays religious politics for votes,” per the query – a claim backed by data. BJP’s 2014-2024 dominance (303 seats in 2019) owes to polarizing tactics: Article 370 abrogation, CAA-NRC, and UCC promises framed as Hindu restoration.
The Ram Mandir movement exemplifies: LK Advani’s 1990 Rath Yatra mobilized 10 million, blending faith with anti-minority sentiment. Post-2019, Yogi Adityanath’s UP model – “Sabka Saath” with bulldozer justice – won 62/80 seats. X post @sai__varma00 dreams of BJP in Bengal/Telangana, but @bumblebee_1128 counters: “Telangana sentiment is stronger than Hindutva.”
Criticisms: It erodes secularism, per Carnegie reports, fostering “love jihad” myths and anti-Muslim violence (e.g., 2020 Delhi riots). Yet, BJP’s OBC consolidation shows it’s not just “elite” – 52% Hindu vote share in 2019 crossed castes. Carnegieendowment.org | Internationalaffairs.org.au | Mdpi.com
For Hindutva in Indian elections, it’s a vote-multiplier, but risks backlash: 2024 saw BJP drop to 240 seats, coalition-dependent.
Global Dimensions: Hindutva Beyond Borders
Hindutva’s export via diaspora – HSS in the US, UK – raises alarms. Rutgers reports it funds divisive politics, undermining pluralism. X: “Hindutva in America… grounded in Hindu supremacy” (@csrr_rutgers, implied). Yet, it fosters pride amid Islamophobia. Csrr.rutgers.edu
Balanced view: Global Hindutva amplifies voice but risks isolation, as UN critiques CAA.
Counterarguments: Hindutva as Cultural Renaissance
Defenders like @ARanganathan72 argue: “Left-liberals… attack Hindutva instead [of Hinduism].” Supreme Court (1995) equated it to “way of life.” It counters “pseudo-secularism,” per @irajputaryan (post 38). Asianstudies.org
Truth: Renaissance for some; regression for minorities.
The Future of Hindutva: Challenges and Reforms
As 2025 unfolds, Hindutva faces youth disillusionment (@irajputaryan: “Ascendancy of genuine Hindutva imminent”). Economic woes, climate crises demand beyond religion.
Reform: Integrate true Sanatan – pluralism, ecology – sans majoritarianism.
Conclusion: Reclaiming Authenticity in a Borrowed Identity
Hindutva, born from “Hindu” – a term gifted by Greeks, Persians, Arabs – is no simple ideology but a mirror to India’s fractures. It revives Sanatan pride yet risks deception by elites chasing votes through selective narratives. Vedas’ one God contrasts Puranic idols not as enslavement but evolution; Hindutva’s politics amplifies this for power, Truthfully, it’s neither savior nor scourge – a tool shaped by users. For Sanatan followers, discernment is key: Vote for dharma, not division. As searches for what is Hindutva surge, may dialogue prevail over dogma.
Click the ad to read the content.
Open Telegram